The Truth Everyone Feels But Nobody Says Out Loud
Let’s stop pretending. Most employees don’t trust HR. Many leaders get frustrated with HR. And a whole lot of HR professionals feel stuck in the middle, carrying the weight of decisions they didn’t make, outcomes they can’t control, and reputations they didn’t earn.
Why people hate HR isn’t a mystery. It’s a reaction. And sometimes, it’s a completely valid one.
But here’s the part nobody talks about: sometimes HR hates it too. Not the work itself, but what the role becomes when the system around it is broken. When leadership won’t listen. When policy replaces people. When you become the messenger for someone else’s bad decisions.
I spent 15 years inside the HR function. I’ve sat across the table from employees who looked at me like the enemy. I’ve sat in leadership meetings where I was told to “make it work” with no authority to change a thing. And I’ve watched good HR people burn out because the gap between responsibility and power was just too wide to bridge.
This isn’t a defense of bad HR. Bad HR absolutely exists. This is the full picture, the one that explains why people hate HR, why HR sometimes hates it too, and what actually needs to change.
Why Employees Hate HR — And Why Their Perception Matters
Ask anyone who’s had a bad experience at work, and chances are HR comes up in the story. Not as the hero. As the gatekeeper. The politician. The shield for leadership.
Why people hate HR often comes down to a few recurring perceptions:
HR is the gatekeeper. You need permission. You need approval. You need to go through the process. HR becomes the department that stands between you and what you want — whether that’s a raise, a transfer, or accountability for someone else’s behavior.
HR is political. Employees see HR sitting in leadership meetings, attending executive retreats, and making decisions behind closed doors. It doesn’t matter if HR is fighting for them in those rooms. What employees see is a power alignment.
HR is the leadership shield. When a manager behaves badly, and nothing happens, employees don’t blame the CEO who made the call to keep them. They blame HR. HR becomes the face of every decision leadership refuses to make.
HR investigations feel pre-decided. When someone files a complaint and the outcome doesn’t match their expectations, it’s assumed that the conclusion was written before the investigation began.
Are these perceptions always accurate? No. But perception is reality in the workplace. And this is why people hate HR — not because every HR professional is bad, but because the system positions HR as the face of every broken process and every uncomfortable outcome.
Why Leaders Get Frustrated With HR Too
It’s not just employees. Leaders have their own list of grievances, and understanding why people hate HR means understanding both sides of the table.
Leaders get frustrated when HR prioritizes policy over context. When every situation goes through the same process regardless of nuance. When the answer is always “we need to document this for six more months,” while a team is falling apart right now.
They get frustrated with slow decision cycles. By the time HR completes an investigation, conducts the review, and presents recommendations, the damage has already been done. The team has already lost its best people. The culture has already shifted.
They get frustrated with what feels like a power imbalance. HR can slow things down, escalate concerns, or block decisions, but often can’t move as fast as the business needs.
And sometimes, leaders are frustrated because HR is doing its job correctly, telling them things they don’t want to hear.
The Truth No One Talks About: HR Often Doesn’t Control the Final Decision
Here’s where the conversation about why people hate HR gets honest.
HR can recommend. HR can advise. HR can document. HR can escalate.
But HR cannot always fire. HR cannot always promote. HR cannot always remove a toxic leader. HR cannot restructure a team. HR cannot override an executive who has already made up their mind.
The gap between what people think HR can do and what HR actually controls is enormous. And that gap is where most of the frustration lies, on both sides.
When HR Knows Exactly What’s Wrong — And Can’t Fix It
This is the section that no one writes. This is one of the reasons people hate HR: HR professionals carry it in silence.
Picture this scenario. It happens in organizations every single day.
There’s a star performer. High output. High revenue. High visibility. And serious damage.
HR sees the burnout signals spreading through the team. HR receives complaints, both formal and informal. HR tracks the attrition risk. HR identifies the behavior patterns that are slowly poisoning the culture.
HR recommends coaching. HR recommends a performance plan that addresses the behavior, not just the numbers. HR recommends boundary-setting. In the worst cases, HR recommends an exit strategy.
Leadership says: “They’re too valuable.” “Not now.” “We’ll deal with it later.”
So HR documents. HR supports the affected employees as best it can. HR raises the concern again. And again.
Then later — sometimes months, sometimes years — the team leaves. The culture breaks. The legal risk increases. And HR gets blamed for all of it.
Sometimes, HR isn’t protecting against toxic leadership or toxic employees. Sometimes, HR documents the risk that leadership chooses to accept.
This is the invisible weight. This is why understanding why people hate HR requires understanding the structural constraints under which HR operates.
Why Good HR People Get Burned Out
Good HR professionals see problems early. That’s their job. But seeing problems early doesn’t mean they can solve them early.
They lose escalation battles with leadership who won’t act. They carry the emotional load of employees who come to them in crisis. They become the public face of decisions they didn’t make, policies they didn’t write, and outcomes they fought against behind closed doors.
The burnout isn’t from the work itself. It’s from the gap between responsibility and authority. It’s from being held accountable for culture while having no control over the leadership behavior that shapes it.
This is why people hate HR from the inside too. Not the mission — but the machinery.
The Structural Problem With Modern HR
Modern HR is responsible for culture, retention, compliance, and employee trust. But it doesn’t control leadership behavior, budget allocation, organizational design, or power structures.
That’s like being responsible for the weather but only having control over whether you carry an umbrella.
The reason why people hate HR is often structural, not personal. The function is set up to absorb blame for systemic problems it didn’t create and can’t unilaterally fix.
HR is stuck in old models — process-heavy, slow to adopt technology, positioned as an order-taker rather than a strategic partner. Many HR departments want a seat at the strategic table but lack the structural authority to actually influence what happens once they sit down.
Why I Went Into HR Anyway
I went into HR because I believed fair and firm could exist in the same sentence. I believed investigation should come before assumption. I believe honesty is kindness, even when it’s uncomfortable. And I believed that people and business can both win.
I still believe all of that. But I learned something else along the way: believing those things and being structurally empowered to act on them are two very different things.
That’s not a reason to stop trying. It’s a reason to change the model.
What Good HR Actually Looks Like
Good HR is truth-telling, not political. It’s business-fluent and human-fluent at the same time. It’s data-informed but not data-hiding. It’s power-aware without being power-serving. It’s courageous but realistic about what it can and cannot control.
Good HR doesn’t pretend the system is working when it isn’t. And it doesn’t ask employees to pretend either.
Understanding why people hate HR also means recognizing what good HR looks like when you find it, and fighting to protect it.
The Future of HR — If It Wants to Survive
If HR wants to stop being the most misunderstood function in the workplace, it has to evolve. Not incrementally. Structurally.
HR must become risk translators, helping leadership understand the real costs of decisions about people, not just the P&L implications.
HR must become leadership challengers, not adversaries, but honest partners who push back when it’s the right thing to do.
HR must become system designers, not just policy enforcers, but architects of how work actually functions.
HR must become trust builders, earning credibility through transparency, consistency, and follow-through, not through proximity to power.
So, Why Do People Hate HR?
People don’t hate HR. They hate what HR represents when systems are broken. They hate being told to trust a process that has let them down. They hate the gap between what HR promises and what leadership allows HR to deliver.
And sometimes — more often than you know — HR hates that version of itself too.
HR is often responsible for outcomes it doesn’t control. Bad HR exists. But so does HR, that is fighting battles you will never see.
The system needs to change. For employees. For leaders. And for the HR professionals who got into this work because they actually cared about people.
If you’re navigating a broken system right now, whether you’re the employee, the leader, or the HR professional caught in the middle, you don’t have to figure it out alone.
Ready to stop surviving your workplace and start strategizing your next move?
Book a free 30-minute strategy call with Eunioa, and let’s build a plan that puts your career back in your hands. https://calendly.com/rosey-singh-eunioa/free-strategy-call
Already know someone who needs to read this? Share it. Tag them. Forward it. The conversation about why people hate HR needs to include the full truth — not just the version that’s comfortable.
